Posts Tagged ‘Grizzlies’

Image

Despite the fact he was still rehabbing a tear in his Achilles tendon, Kobe Bryant was awarded a two-year contract extension on November 18th. The terms of the contract are two years for approximately $48.5 million.

Bryant and the Lakers have faced a lot of backlash since the move, with fans and analysts calling Bryant selfish for taking so much money from a team that has plenty of other issues. Bryant took to his twitter page the next night to defend the extension. Bryant tweeted “The cap rules players have to be “selfless” on To “help” BILLIONAIRE owners R the same cap rules the owners LOCKED US out to put in #think.” He also tweeted “Don’t just learn ur sport .. Learn the sports industry #futureathletes.”

There is no denying the impact that Kobe has had in the NBA and that he has earned this money. However, Bryant may need to take some of his own advice and learn the sports industry. If nothing else is true about this industry, the one fact of the industry is loyalty means nothing. With these tweets and the situation in general, a bigger question can be raised. Should teams have to pay homage to there former stars?

To start this off lets look at some of the contracts of the biggest stars in major sports. Derek Jeter, at the age of 39, just signed a one-year contract for $12 million. This comes after he signed a three-year contract for $45 million at the age of 36. Playing in a total of 17 games last year, Jeter hit .190 with 1 HR and 7 RBI. He then injured his ankle and was done for the season.

Bryant’s and Jeter’s situations are even more similar when you look at the situations of their teams. Both the Yankees and the Lakers are in a free fall. Both teams have money tied up in bad contracts and have a general lack of talent on their respective teams. Yet, Jeter and Bryant had no issue taking these large contracts that deter their teams from fixing their issues.

The argument for Jeter and Bryant making their salaries is that they need to be paid not only for what they will do, but what they have done. It is undeniable that these two are among the best of all time in their respective games. Jeter led the Yankees to 5 World Series rings & may go down as the greatest shortstop of all time. Similarly, Kobe has 5 rings and arguments (granted to a lesser extent) have been made that he is the greatest basketball player of all time.

The question ultimately comes down to this. Do teams have pay their long tenured players more because of their past actions. The answer to this question varies. Look at Jim Irsay. He only had to pay Peyton Manning what his contract already was. Instead he released Manning and selected Andrew Luck with the #1 overall pick in the 2012 NFL Draft. This move was praised by some and criticized by other. However, there was one universal agreement, there is no loyalty in sports.

This example can go even further. When Danny Ainge traded Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett, he was bombarded with criticism for having a lack of loyalty to his players. Yet, the deal was better for the team, as a whole, in the long term as they brought in expiring contracts and future draft picks to build their team with.

The one option not many people mention is why don’t these players just take less money. That’s the situation of future Hall of Fame PF Dirk Nowitzki. Reports have surfaced that Nowitzki will want to slash his salary by more than half next season so that his team, the Dallas Mavericks, can continue to rebuild. This is an admirable situation, which, unfortunately, does not happen as often as it should in the professional sports.

So is it wrong to trade Pierce or release Manning? At the end of the day, an owner, general manager, and coach need to decide whom they have to be loyal to. Do you have to be loyal to a specific player or an entire team? Last time I checked, there are 52 players on an NFL team and 24 on and MLB team. So why must you be loyal to the minority? Yes this is a utilitarian type of thinking, but it isn’t as far fetched, as it may seem. Must there be more loyalty to Kobe Bryant then an entire team and that teams fan base? That is the ultimate question.

Advertisements

Image

After winning a playoff series for the first time in a decade, expectations were high for the 2013-2014 New York Knicks. Add in the fact that they play in the most famous arena in the world and the New York media; anything short of a conference finals appearance would have been considered a disappointment. Now a quarter of the way through the season, those expectations seem like a distant memory. At 8-18 lets see what has happened to the Knickerbockers.

The first glaring issue the Knicks have had this year is their lack of presence on the boards. They are ranked 29th in the NBA, averaging only 39 rebounds per game. The reason for this is because they lack physical big men on this team. They were exposed of this weakness even further when starting Center Tyson Chandler was lost for 4-6 weeks with a right fibula fracture. Forced to play 7 foot Power Forward Andrea Bargnani at Center (who averaged 5 rebounds a game in his career), New York constantly failed to grab a contested rebound. In a recent game against the Memphis Grizzlies, the Knicks were outrebounded 56-29. This massive problem doesn’t seem to have a solution at the moment, due to the Knicks roster. New Yorks current big men are Chandler, Bargnani, bench warmer Cole Aldrich, and the broken down Amare Stoudemire.

Another prevalent issue with the Knicks is there lack of discipline. Coach Mike Woodson has let the lunatics run the asylum. This has led to constant ill-advised shots, fights in the locker room, and general anarchy around the team. This dysfunction was put on display in a game against the Milwaukee Bucks. With :11 seconds on the clock and a two point lead in overtime, Tyson Changler grabbed a big rebound. Chandler then passed the ball out to Bargnani. With the shot clock off, Bargnani inexplicably put up a three and missed. The bucks would then tie the game on their possession and send the game into double overtime. Woodson attempted to put his foot down by setting a 10:00 pm curfew on his players. This did absolutely nothing as New York was blown out the next day. If New York has any chance of righting the ship this season, Woodson needs to go. With a career record of 286-337, he hasn’t exactly been a fantastic coach. The Knicks need a disciplinarian to come in and control this team, which is something Woodson doesn’t offer.

Lastly, someone who encompasses all of the Knicks issues is one is Shooting Guard J.R. Smith. Smith has always been a head case, but this season he has turned into a full out circus. Before he even hit the court this year, J.R. was suspended for the first five games of the season for his third failed drug test for marijuana. In addition, Incarcerated Bob reported that Smith was doing cocaine in nightclubs during the playoffs last year. Once he hit the floor, Smith made Knicks fans wish they got high before watching him. The reigning sixth man of the year is averaging a career low 11.2 points per game. He also has a pitiful field goal percentage of 34.1 (also a career low). The embarrassing year came full circle when Smith put up a record 17 three pointers in a game against the Bucks. Of those 17 shots, he hit five. Smith is a malignant cancer to the Knicks locker room. With his selfishness, lack of game I.Q., and wild behavior, he is a perfect representation of the team as a whole.

Can this team make the playoffs? Maybe. Can this team compete in the playoffs? Absolutely not. The Knicks are the picture of dysfunction and have been for years. In reality, until James Dolan is no longer the owner, the Knicks will stay that way.